Ego Dominus Tuus
Listen
Hic
Ille
Hic
Ille
Hic
Ille
Hic
Ille
Hic
Ille
Hic
Ille
Text: Poetry, by W. B. Yeats (Standard Ebooks, 2024), from the collected editions of 1908 to 1928. Public domain.
In brief
SummaryTwo voices argue whether art comes from finding yourself or your opposite.
Two speakers, Hic ("this one") and Ille ("that one"), talk by a stream below an old tower at night. Ille is tracing magical shapes in the sand; he says he seeks not himself but his "opposite", an anti-self. Hic answers that modern people want to find themselves, and points to Dante, who seems to have done so completely. Ille replies that Dante's famous hollow face was an image made from his opposite, shaped by hunger, exile and a hopeless love. They turn to Keats: Hic sees a happy poet, Ille a poor, sick schoolboy staring into a sweet-shop window, whose rich poems came from all he lacked. Hic urges patient study of great masters. Ille ends by calling to a mysterious double, most like him and most unlike him, who will reveal all he seeks.
Lines to remember
I call to my own opposite, summon all
The struggle of the fly in marmalade.
Because I seek an image not a book.
Line by line
Lines 1 to 7Hic sets the scene
Hic describes Ille walking on grey sand by a stream under a "wind-beaten tower", where a lamp still burns beside a book left by Michael Robartes. Though past "the best of life", Ille still traces "Magical shapes", in the grip of an "unconquerable delusion".
Lines 8 to 10Calling the opposite
Ille's first reply states the poem's central idea. With the help of an image he calls to his "own opposite", to everything he has "handled least, least looked upon". Art, for him, reaches towards what the self is not.
Line 11Hic's wish
Hic's answer is a single line, and it is the modern view in brief: "And I would find myself and not an image." Self-discovery, not a mask or symbol, is what he wants from art.
Lines 12 to 18The modern mind
Ille calls that "our modern hope" and says it has made artists gentle and sensitive but cost them "the old nonchalance of the hand". Whatever the tool, "chisel, pen or brush", modern artists are "but critics", timid, entangled and abashed.
Lines 19 to 24Hic on Dante
Hic offers Dante as proof that an artist can find himself. Dante did it so completely that his "hollow face" is clearer to the mind's eye than any face except Christ's. The long phrase "chief imagination of Christendom" gives him full weight.
Lines 25 to 40Dante's opposite
Ille asks whether that face shows the real man "that Lapo and that Guido knew". He thinks Dante made an image from his opposite, out of hunger for "the apple on the bough / Most out of reach". Mocked for his "lecherous life" and driven into bitter exile, he found "unpersuadable justice" and the most exalted lady ever loved.
Lines 41 to 44Happy artists
Hic objects that some artists make their work from no "tragic war" at all. They are "lovers of life", impulsive people who look for happiness "And sing when they have found it".
Lines 45 to 55Action and vision
Ille denies it. Those who love the world serve it through action and grow rich and influential; even their art is action, "The struggle of the fly in marmalade". The rhetorician deceives others, the sentimentalist himself, while true art is "a vision of reality" that leaves the artist only "dissipation and despair".
Lines 56 to 58Hic on Keats
Hic plays another card: nobody denies Keats his "love of the world". He asks Ille to remember Keats's "deliberate happiness", the chosen joy of his poems.
Lines 59 to 67The sweet-shop window
Ille grants that the art is happy but asks "who knows his mind?" He pictures Keats as a schoolboy with his nose "pressed to a sweet-shop window": poor, ailing, shut out from luxury, "The coarse-bred son of a livery stable-keeper". From that hunger came "Luxuriant song".
Lines 68 to 72Hic's advice
Hic asks why Ille leaves his lamp and book to draw signs in the sand. His own answer is sober and practical: style is found by "sedentary toil" and by imitating "great masters".
Lines 73 to 85The anti-self
"Because I seek an image not a book." Ille calls to a "mysterious one" who will walk these sands and look most like him, "my double", yet be "my anti-self". This figure will whisper all he seeks, softly, for fear the dawn birds carry it "away to blasphemous men".
Themes
Self and anti-self
The poem's central claim is Ille's: an artist does not express himself but calls up his "own opposite", "my double" who is also "my anti-self". Dante's austere face and Keats's rich music are both read as images of what those men lacked. Hic's wish, "I would find myself", is presented as the timid modern alternative.
Art and suffering
Ille's examples are men whose art grew out of want: Dante's hunger for "the apple on the bough / Most out of reach", his exile and "bitter bread", Keats's "senses and his heart unsatisfied". Art, in this view, is a vision won at the cost of happiness, leaving the artist "dissipation and despair".
Image and book
Hic trusts books: "sedentary toil" and "imitation of great masters". Ille leaves the lamp and the open book to draw "characters upon the sands", saying "I seek an image not a book". The contrast is between learning a style and waiting for a revelation, and the poem leaves Ille with the last word.
Context
The poem was collected in The Wild Swans at Coole (Cuala Press, 1917). Its title comes from Dante's Vita Nuova, where Love appears to Dante in a vision and says "Ego dominus tuus", Latin for "I am your master". Hic and Ille are Latin for "this one" and "that one"; Ille is usually taken as the voice closest to Yeats's own.
The idea of the anti-self, or mask, was central to Yeats's thinking in these years, and he set it out in prose in Per Amica Silentia Lunae (1918), which opens with this poem. Michael Robartes, whose book lies open by the lamp, is a character from Yeats's stories of the 1890s, and he returns in "The Phases of the Moon".
Form
Blank verse, unrhymed iambic pentameter, set as a dialogue with the speakers' names above each speech. Many speeches end or begin in broken half-lines ("And yet", "No not sing"), which gives the feel of real argument, each voice cutting in on the other.
